tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5756292796580291035.post9117652500292909786..comments2023-10-01T01:56:19.699-07:00Comments on You Made Me Theorize: THE UNCANNY PART II!Joseph P. Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12757706787232014827noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5756292796580291035.post-30289896690188582022010-12-02T06:13:11.050-08:002010-12-02T06:13:11.050-08:00I'm pretty sure "them" acts as an an...I'm pretty sure "them" acts as an antecedent for the "tender sentiments," but I could be wrong. <br /><br />I guess Maddin is arguing for a time where "tender sentiments" are no longer "uncool," and when people are less self-concious of admitting to enjoying something as "melodramatic" as Celine's music<br /><br />?MMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11772474168388069197noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5756292796580291035.post-67018251998295817952010-12-01T19:39:55.418-08:002010-12-01T19:39:55.418-08:00It's scary, for an English major at least, how...It's scary, for an English major at least, how this class has changed the definitions of some words, while keeping the definitions of other words the same. Uncanny? I thought Uncanny used to be Coincidence + Unbelievable. Now it's become Deja Vu+Mysterious. <br /><br />Anyway, I'm with Kelsey about the Pomo Jukebox. Great name. <br /><br />Anybody want to explain the quotation from the book to me? "With inhibitions against them removed, the tender sentiments might unveil their unsuspected splendors. (133)" that "THEM" is very vague!Arjunhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08876728543064630226noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5756292796580291035.post-82898816661735578162010-12-01T13:59:05.896-08:002010-12-01T13:59:05.896-08:00Hahaha, The Pomo Jukebox. I've never heard of ...Hahaha, The Pomo Jukebox. I've never heard of them but that name is great. Almost too much but actually just right.Kelseyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08702407667939715244noreply@blogger.com